I thought about those examples such as spiritual baptists of the south,snake handlers, etc. but did not think that someone "catching the spirit" necessarily met the rest of the original poster's definition of Neo - shaman and certainly not that of any other traditional or indigenous person that fit that particular role(shaman type). As for anything in the old testament -well that too is pre-christian. I do not have any issue with the term Neo-Pagan, It just isn't me. Having said that, isn't that co-opting or diluting the term?????In the documentary I referenced (Holy Ghost People) the preacher was acting very much like a houngenikon at a Vodou fet. He was using the cadences of his preaching, including bits of glossolalia, to "bring the spirit down" on congregants. Others would lay on hands, begin singing at people who were wavering in and out of trance and generally act to induce an altered state of mystical consciousness. I think that there are definite commonalities in the techniques used, the energy raised, and the final results. I wouldn't call those people shamans or neo-Shamans - it would dilute the term and they would take it as an insult. But I think they have incorporated elements of shamanism and shamanic practice into their contemporary Christian spirituality.
I am looking forward to the release of your next book!
There are very real problems with the word "Shaman." Originally it describes a spiritual/political office found within a few indigenous Siberian tribes. Mircea Eliade
2 comments:
This is only sort-of related, but Lupa over at Therioshamanism had a great post not too long ago about how various modern professions are fulfilling the shaman's role in modern society. Worth checking out.
Your a pretty amazing individual Kenaz! I love your voodou money magic book as I'm currently reading it. I read your first bood about Voodou and was very impressed. You also seem to have a firm and educational grasp of all kinds of practices which impresses me. :)
Post a Comment